I have to admit, I had my concerns prior to President Barak Obama speech of March 23rd
Jerusalem. Ben Rhods interview to the Israeli press was really frightening; even now I shiver
slightly when I think of it. But after listening and reading President Obamabrilliantly planed speech, I am allowing myself a wider degree of optimism. The
reason is simple, President Obama did everything he could to encourage the
possibility of peace. And that puts the peace process in a far better place.
When it comes to advancing a peace process first thing, create a desirable image of peace. Describing
success in the civilian eras of agriculture and high-tech, with the
opportunities for social and economic prosperity, serve that purpose. Second,
acknowledge the risks involved, it adds credibility, making the idea of peace
look less like a dream and more down – to – earth; especially when
acknowledging that there are threats to peace at the other side. Threats such
as: terrorism, hatred produced by years of propaganda and incitement, and the
very idea of rejecting Israel's
right to exist as a Jewish state.
Israel cannot be expected to negotiate with anyone who is
dedicated to its destruction." A line of truth aimed at non-other
than the hard core left. For years Israelis have been hearing "you don't
make peace with your friends, you make peace with your enemies." Israel
implemented that logic with the Mubarak regime. For a while it worked. Egypt wanted the Sinai back and that was more
important to them than the objection to Israel's existence. But the objection
remind, manifesting in the form of incitement encouraged by the Mubarak regime
and by opposition forces. As a result, all segments of Egyptian society are now
hostile to Israel.
And that is undermining the peace treaty. Today, minimal diplomatic exchangesare viewed as scandalous. There is a very simple universal truth behind this
situation. Problems do not go away just because we ignore them. For decades
critics of the settlements policy did just that. Constantly ignoring the
incitement against Israel's
right to exist; incitement that prevails throughout the Arab world, and does
not stop with Israel.
As a result they lost their credibility in the eyes of the Israeli public, and
Third step: security, security, security. Security means that the lives of each and every member of the audience and every Israeli out there are important.
But before all of that President Obama had to create a platform of trust in order to connect between him and the Israeli public. Reaffirming
Israel's history, identity,
connection to the land and the right of the Jews for self-determination, all did
that. Humor and charisma helped too, a lot. To the annalists this trust is
about getting the Israeli public to pressure the Israeli leadership. But trust
is required for something far more important than this myopia. Trust is what
keeps a peace process moving. Getting the leaders to act is only secondary to
creating a trust between Israelis and Palestinians. The media, not
surprisingly, ignored that, Obama did not, and that is for his credit. The
story about Palestinian youth that want to get a lone just like Israelis do
meant to do just that. Give Israelis a human face of the enemy. Was it naive as
the right wing claim? Absolutely! One does not have to be a right wing to know
that. Yet, it is essential, because peace is about getting each side to see the
other as human beings! Whatever our political convictions may be, only those of
us that are trying to find humanity in the other side want peace.
What was lost by all the annalists and commentators, left and right, is that all the merits of
listed by the president simply describe Jews as human being. As people that all
they want is "the ability to make their own
decisions and to get an education, get a good job; to worship God in their own
way; to get married; to raise a family." And like all nations have
the right for self-determination.
Not surprisingly a single voice of outrage came from the Arab world. As far as that outrage was concerned, getting Israeli Jews to see Palestinian as human being is insignificant. It is more important to deny that from Jews. The logic behind that outrage is very simple. If you deny one group the right to be human beings, the right to exist, why would you want them to acknowledge the humanity of your own group?
And yes, this proves the naivety in the president's request. Loudly!
But don't let that loudness hush what comes next:
"One of the great ironies of what’s happening in the broader region is that so much of what people are yearning for -- education, entrepreneurship, the ability to start a business without paying a bribe, the ability to connect to the global economy -- those are things that can be found here in
Israel. This should be a hub for thriving regional trade, and an engine for opportunity."
There is a message here to the Arab world. A message to that outrage, "You need
Only those familiar with the frustrations involved when trying to improve the
standard of living in the Arab world will know that. And there is nothing naïve
about that. For obvious reasons Israelis are not familiar with this experience.
This is criticism of the Arab world and it is long overdue. It is a call for
the Arab world to make an outreach to Israel. And that is new.
Peace requires an effort by both sides. That effort requires a will. Will cannot be imposed, but it can be encouraged. That is the role of the international community. The job of the
is to make sure the international community remains in that role and not become
another battlefield between the two sides. When the USA
gives reasons for both sides to want peace, security for Israel, and
prosperity for the Arab World, it does both things. Encourages the formation of
a will in both sides and maintains the integrity of the international
community. Standing beside Israel
blocks attempts to score points against Israel in that battlefield.
Therefore, the framework in which a peace process can take place is there. But
a framework is barely a corner stone. The Israeli applause to the president
speech showed that on the Israeli side the will exist. If there is a will on
the Arab side, the outrage that came from there hides it well.